The Mechanism and Effect of Governing the World Cultural Heritage Site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces in the Context of Tourism-based Poverty Alleviation

WU Wenjia; SUN Jiuxia

doi:10.6054/j.jscnun.2022077

Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition) > 2022 > 54(5): 108-116. > DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2022077

WU Wenjia, SUN Jiuxia. The Mechanism and Effect of Governing the World Cultural Heritage Site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces in the Context of Tourism-based Poverty Alleviation[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 54(5): 108-116. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2022077

Citation:

PDF (1226 KB)

The Mechanism and Effect of Governing the World Cultural Heritage Site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces in the Context of Tourism-based Poverty Alleviation

WU Wenjia^1, ,,
SUN Jiuxia^{2, 3, ,}

1.
School of Cultural Tourism and Geography, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 513020, China
2.
School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
3.
Center for Leisure, Tourism and Social Development, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

More Information

Received Date: June 08, 2021
Available Online: December 15, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Three poverty alleviation plans have been conducted in the World Cultural Heritage Site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces in Yunnan Province, taking tourism-based poverty reduction as a governance approach. The implementation mechanism and process of the poverty alleviation plans are analyzed and traced, and the effects of tourism-based poverty alleviation in the rural heritage sites are observed and compared. As the study demonstrates, tourism-based poverty alleviation is a form of heritage site management, a dynamic system consisting of the governance subject, the governance technology, the public response and the discourse and knowledge produced in the process of governance; and in this system, a stable structure is formed among the powers and an interactive relation among the multiple subjects in the process of heritage site governance. In addition, the governance of heritage sites can be divided into the tool type, the object type and the conjugate type according to the rationality of the governance subject and the role of heritage tourism industry. Finally, under the background of "strong government but weak society", the governance of Chinese heritage sites presents the trend of cultural power "recentralization". The government's presence and the third-party supervision are the core for ensuring the governance efficiency of Chinese heritage sites in the authoritative governance system. Combining "world heritage culture" with local culture and using governance techniques that suit the heritage sites can give better play to the efficacy of cultural governance.
- rural revitalization,
- tourism-based poverty alleviation,
- heritage site governance,
- Honghe Hani rice terraces

FullText(HTML)

References (35)

References

[1]	刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007 LIU Y S, ZHOU Y, LI Y H. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[2]	刘彦随, 曹智. 精准扶贫供给侧结构及其改革策略[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(10): 1066-1073. doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2017.10.003 LIU Y S, CAO Z. Supply-side structural reform and its strategy for targeted poverty alleviation in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(10): 1066-1073. doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2017.10.003
[3]	GOMERSALL K. Imposition to agonism: voluntary poverty alleviation resettlement in rural China[J]. Political Geography, 2020, 82: 102250/1-8.
[4]	人民日报. 深入把握精准扶贫精准脱贫基本方略[N]. [2022-05-30]. http://www.qstheory.cn/2019-08/15/c_1124879505.htm.
[5]	LIU Y S, LI Y H. Revitalize the world's countryside[J]. Nature, 2017, 548: 275-277. doi: 10.1038/548275a
[6]	文化和旅游部. 旅游发展解决贫困户脱贫占整个扶贫总任务的17%-20%[EB/OL]. [2021-09-05]. http://travel.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0509/c41570-31702885.html.
[7]	张朝枝, 郑艳芬. 文化遗产保护与利用关系的国际规则演变[J]. 旅游学刊, 2011, 26(1): 81-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYXK201101021.htm ZHANG C Z, ZHENG Y F. On the evolution of international rules regarding the relationship between the protection of cultural heritages and utilization[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2011, 26(1): 81-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYXK201101021.htm
[8]	孟凯, 李佳宾, 陈险峰, 等. 乡村旅游地发展过程中"公地悲剧"的演化与治理[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(8): 23-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYXK201808010.htm MENG K, LI J B, CHEN X F, et al. Revolution and governance of "tragedy of the commons" in the developing process of rural tourism destination[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(8): 23-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYXK201808010.htm
[9]	阮仪三, 肖建莉. 寻求遗产保护和旅游发展的"双赢"之路[J]. 城市规划, 2003, 27(6): 86-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH200306018.htm
[10]	王亚华, 苏毅清, 舒全峰. 劳动力外流、农村集体行动与乡村振兴[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 37(3): 173-187;219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHDZ202203014.htm WANG Y H, SU Y Q, SHU Q F. Labor out-migration, rural collective action and rural revitalization[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2022, 37(3): 173-187;219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHDZ202203014.htm
[11]	雒树刚. 发挥文化制度优势提高文化治理能力[J]. 毛泽东研究, 2020(1): 4-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMZD202001001.htm
[12]	梁栋栋, 陆林. 古村落型旅游地土地利用的初步研究——世界文化遗产黟县西递案例分析[J]. 经济地理, 2005, 25(4): 562-564. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL200504030.htm LIANG D D, LU L. A preliminary study on land use in ancient village tourist destinations──A case study of the World Cultural Heritage Xidi in Yi County[J]. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(4): 562-564. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL200504030.htm
[13]	王少华, 梁留科. 旅游产业集聚背景下遗产区土地格局演变及机理——以龙门石窟为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(12): 216-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL201512030.htm WANG S H, LIANG L K. Mechanisms and spatial pattern changes of land use of World Heritage tourist attractions in the perspective of tourism agglomeration—A Case of Longmen Grottoes, Luoyang[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(12): 216-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL201512030.htm
[14]	刘逸飞. 中山市石岐河两岸工业遗存空间转型研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020: 58-64. LIU Y F. Study on spatial transformation of industrial relics along Shiqi River in Zhongshan[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020: 58-64.
[15]	仲丹丹, 徐苏斌, 王琳, 等. 划拨土地使用权制度影响下的工业遗产保护再利用——以北京、上海为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2016(3): 24-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZXB201603005.htm ZHONG D D, XU S B, WANG L, et al. Preservation and regeneration of industrial heritage with the regulative influence of appropriation of land-use rights case studies in Beijing and Shanghai[J]. Architectural Journal, 2016(3): 24-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZXB201603005.htm
[16]	康璟瑶, 章锦河, 胡欢, 等. 中国传统村落空间分布特征分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(7): 839-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKJ201607005.htm KANG J Y, ZHANG J H, HU H, et al. Analysis on the spatial distribution characteristics of Chinese traditional villages[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(7): 839-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKJ201607005.htm
[17]	OAKES T. Heritage as improvement: cultural display and contested governance in rural China[J]. Modern China, 2013, 39(4): 380-407.
[18]	QIAN J. Redeeming the Chinese modernity? Zen Buddhism, culture-led development and local governance in Xinxing County, China[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2019(1): 187-205.
[19]	龚浩群, 姚畅. 迈向批判性遗产研究: 非物质文化遗产保护中的知识困惑与范式转型[J]. 文化遗产, 2018(5): 70-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WHYA201805010.htm
[20]	HARRISON R. Heritage: critical approach[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
[21]	MILES M. Interruptions: testing the rhetoric of culturally led urban development[J]. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(5/6): 889-911.
[22]	LUTZ S, KOCH G. Sustainability, sustainable development, and culture: diverging concepts and practices in European heritage work[M]. Switzerland AG: Springer, 2017: 71-84.
[23]	RIPP M, RODWELL D. Governance in UNESCO world heritage Sites: reframing the role of management plans as a tool to improve community engagement[M]. Springer, 2018: 241-253.
[24]	BARNES T J. Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the "cultural turn"[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2001, 91(3): 546-565.
[25]	SCHMIDT V A. The politics of economic adjustment in France and Britain: when does discourse matter?[J]. Journal of European Public Policy, 2011, 8(2): 247-264.
[26]	ZHU Z. Yunnan's industrial development policy and intermediate goods trade with MRBCs[M]. Bangkok: Bangkok Research Center, 2011.
[27]	林健. 改革开放以来中国文化政策的变迁动力研究——基于对1978—2012年中国文化经济政策的考察[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2014.
[28]	BENNETT T. Culture and governmentality[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003: 60.
[29]	托尼·本尼特. 文化、治理与社会——托尼·本尼特自选集[M]. 王杰, 强东红, 等译. 上海: 东方出版出版中心, 2016.
[30]	OAKES T. Making cultural cities in China: governance, sta-te-building, and precarious creativity[J]. EPA: Economy and Space, 2019, 51(1): 178-186.
[31]	BENNETT T. Putting policy into cultural studies[M]. London: Routledge, 1992: 23-34.
[32]	O'REGAN T. (Mis)taking policy: notes on the cultural policy debate[J]. Cultural Studies, 1992, 6(3): 409-423.
[33]	SCOTT J. The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in southeast asia[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
[34]	DEAN M. Cultural governance and individualization[M]. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003: 117-139.
[35]	BANG H P. Culture governance: governing self-reflexive modernity[J]. Public Administration, 2004, 82(1): 157-190.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (367) PDF downloads (169)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Mechanism and Effect of Governing the World Cultural Heritage Site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces in the Context of Tourism-based Poverty Alleviation

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content