A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Protection and Utilization of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province: A Case Study of 27 Chinese Traditional Villages

LIU Siyu; WANG Ruihui; YANG Xihao; TANG Xueqiong

doi:10.6054/j.jscnun.2022071

Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition) > 2022 > 54(5): 48-59. > DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2022071

LIU Siyu, WANG Ruihui, YANG Xihao, TANG Xueqiong. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Protection and Utilization of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province: A Case Study of 27 Chinese Traditional Villages[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 54(5): 48-59. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2022071

Citation:

PDF (3360 KB)

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Protection and Utilization of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province: A Case Study of 27 Chinese Traditional Villages

1.
School of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2.
Shanxi Province Institute of Water Resources and Electric Power Investigation and Design Co. LTD, Taiyuan 030000, China
3.
School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China

More Information

Received Date: June 27, 2022
Available Online: December 15, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

A comprehensive evaluation system for the protection and utilization of traditional villages in Yunnan Province is built to explore how to utilize the excellent local cultural resources of traditional villages and balance their protection and utilization. The study screens indicators from the four aspects of history and culture, social culture, human settlement environment, and industrial economy, and uses the analytic hierarchy process (APH) and entropy value method to carry out the combined weight. The comprehensive evaluation system for the protection and utilization of traditional villages is constructed, including 4 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators, and 40 third-level indicators. An empirical study is conducted of 27 villages selected as the first and second batches of Chinese Traditional Villages in Yunnan. Firstly, the overall protection and utilization level of traditional villages in Yunnan Province is positive, and the protection effect of village resources is satisfactory, and the situation of activation utilization needs to be improved. Second, the protection of historical and cultural heritage of villages is generally ideal, as the protection level of physical cultural heritage is higher than that of intangible cultural heritage. The overall protection of human settlements is positive and the difference in scores between villages is small. The difference in scores of social governance and industrial economy is large. Thirdly, the scoring results of the traditional village protection and utilization evaluation system are summarized and analyzed, and the villages are divided into five categories.
- traditional village,
- protection and utilization,
- evaluation system,
- Yunnan Province

FullText(HTML)

References (22)

References

[1]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国文化部, 国家文物局, 等. 住房城乡建设部文化部国家文物局财政部关于开展传统村落调查的通知[Z/OL]. (2012-04-24)[2022-08-06]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-04/24/content_2121340.htm.
[2]	传统村落保护与发展研究中心. 传统村落网-国家名录[EB/OL]. [2022-10-02]. http://www.chuantongcunluo.com/index.php/Home/Gjml/gjml/id/24.html.
[3]	李茵茵. 基于AHP层次分析法的井陉县中部区域传统村落片区保护研究[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2017. LI Y Y. Research on the partitioned protection of traditional villages in central area od Jingxing county based on analytical hierarchy process[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2017.
[4]	杨悦. 传统村落人居环境评价——以蔚县宋家庄镇为例[D]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2017. YANG Y. The evaluation of traditional village environment—a case study of Songjiazhuang town, Yuxian County[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University, 2017.
[5]	杨立国, 龙花楼, 刘沛林, 等. 传统村落保护度评价体系及其实证研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(3): 121-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RWDL201803015.htm YANG L G, LONG H L, LIU P L, et al. The protection and its evaluation system of traditional village: a case of traditional village in Hunan Province[J]. Human Geography, 2018, 33(3): 121-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RWDL201803015.htm
[6]	杨立国, 刘小兰, 陈伟杨. 传统村落利用度与评价指标体系研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018, 34(4): 561-567. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.04.018 YANG L G, LIU X L, CHEN W Y. Study on utilization and its evaluation system of traditional villages: a case study of traditional villages in Hunan Province[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2018, 34(4): 561-567. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.04.018
[7]	杨立国, 刘沛林. 传统村落文化传承度评价体系及实证研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(12): 203-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL201712026.htm YANG L G, LIU P L. The inheritance and its evaluation system of traditional village culture: a case study of traditional village in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(12): 203-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL201712026.htm
[8]	顾康康, 储金龙, 汪勇政. 黄山市古村落综合品质城乡分异研究[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(8): 984-989. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKX201508007.htm GU K K, CHU J L, WANG Y Z. Urban and rural diffe-rence of comprehensive quality for ancient villages in Huangshan City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(8): 984-989. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKX201508007.htm
[9]	李智, 张小林, 李红波, 等. 基于村域尺度的乡村性评价及乡村发展模式研究——以江苏省金坛市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(8): 1194-1202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKX201708009.htm LIZ Z, ZHANG X L, LI H B, et al. Research on rurality at village scale and rural development model: a case of Jintan City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 1194-1202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKX201708009.htm
[10]	王勇, 周雪, 李广斌. 苏南不同类型传统村落乡村性评价及特征研究——基于苏州12个传统村落的调查[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1311-1321. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLYJ201906005.htm WANG Y, ZHOU X, LI G B. The rurality appraisal and characteristics of different types of traditional villages in southern Jiangsu Province: based on surveys of 12 traditional villages in Suzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(6): 1311-1321. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLYJ201906005.htm
[11]	邹君, 刘媛, 刘沛林. 不同类型传统村落脆弱性比较研究[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(4): 56-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RWDL202004009.htm ZHOU J, LIU Y, LIU P L. A comparative study on vulnera-bility of different types of traditional villages[J]. Human Geography, 2020, 35(4): 56-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RWDL202004009.htm
[12]	邹君, 陈菡, 黄文容, 等. 传统村落活态性定量评价研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 908-917. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKX202006006.htm ZHOU J, CHEN H, HUANG W R, et al. Quantitative eva-luation on the living state of traditional villages[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 908-917. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLKX202006006.htm
[13]	唐常春, 吕昀. 基于历史文化谱系的传统村镇风貌保护研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2008(9): 35-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDCS200809010.htm TANG C C, LV Y. The conservation of style of traditional villages and towns based on historic-cultural genealogy[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2008(9): 35-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDCS200809010.htm
[14]	张卫国, 汪小钗, 黄晓兰. 就地城镇化下村落复兴评价指标体系设计研究[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 42(4): 57-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSW201604007.htm ZHANG W G, WANG X C, HUANG X L. Design and research on evaluation index system of village revival under local urbanization[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 42(4): 57-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSW201604007.htm
[15]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家文物局. 关于开展国家历史名城、中国历史文化名镇名村保护工作检查的通知[Z/OL]. (2011-02-28)[2022-09-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-02/28/content_1812883.htm.
[16]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国文化部, 国家文物局, 等. 住房城乡建设部等部门关于印发《传统村落评价认定指标体系(试行)》的通知[Z/OL]. (2012-08-31)[2022-10-01]. https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201208/20120831_211267.html
[17]	李尔威. 广佛地区历史文化村镇保护状况评价[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019. LI E W. Evaluation on the protection of historical and cultural villages and towns in Guangzhou&Foshan area[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2019.
[18]	丁志华. 传统村落活态保护评价体系构建及实证研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019. DING Z H. Establishment and empirical study on the evaluation system of living protection of traditional villages[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019.
[19]	张峻溪. 传统村落保护发展规划实施效果评估[D]. 合肥: 安徽建筑大学, 2019. ZHANG J X. Evaluation of the implementation effect of traditional village protection and development planning[D]. Hefei: Anhui Jianzhu University, 2019.
[20]	仇美蓉. 桂北传统村落保护与发展绩效评价研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2019. QIU M R. Study on the performance evaluation system of traditional village protection and development in north Guangxi area[D]. Guilin: Guilin University of Technology, 2019.
[21]	宋敏, 仲德崑, 王单珩. 历史文化村落保护与利用的体系规划探析——以浙江省江山市为例[J]. 城市规划, 2017, 41(5): 69-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH201705010.htm SONG M, ZHONG D K, WANG D H. Exploration on the preservation and utilization system planning for historic villages: a case study of Jiangshan City, Zhejiang Province[J]. City Planning Reviwe, 2017, 41(5): 69-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH201705010.htm
[22]	刘渌璐, 肖大威, 张肖. 历史文化村落保护实施效果评估及应用[J]. 城市规划, 2016, 40(6): 94-98;112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH201606016.htm LIU L L, XIAO D W, ZHANG X. Implementation effect evakuation and application of historic and cultural village conservation[J]. City Planning Reviwe, 2016, 40(6): 94-98;112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH201606016.htm

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (367) PDF downloads (132)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Protection and Utilization of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province: A Case Study of 27 Chinese Traditional Villages

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content