• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
XIE Ziying, ZHANG Zhengdong, CHEN Yuchan, LI Qingpu, YANG Yang, KUANG Tengfei. Constructing the Spatial Ecological Network Based on the Relationship Between Greenways and Habitats: A Case Study of the Habitat of the Keystone Species in Conghua District[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 53(1): 70-77. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2021011
Citation: XIE Ziying, ZHANG Zhengdong, CHEN Yuchan, LI Qingpu, YANG Yang, KUANG Tengfei. Constructing the Spatial Ecological Network Based on the Relationship Between Greenways and Habitats: A Case Study of the Habitat of the Keystone Species in Conghua District[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 53(1): 70-77. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2021011

Constructing the Spatial Ecological Network Based on the Relationship Between Greenways and Habitats: A Case Study of the Habitat of the Keystone Species in Conghua District

More Information
  • Received Date: July 06, 2020
  • Available Online: March 23, 2021
  • Conghua District, Guangzhou City, is chosen as the area for study, and the habitats of keystone species in this area are selected to be the ecological sources. The minimum cumulative resistance model is used to pick biological corridors and determine the ecological nodes, and the spatial ecological network is constructed on the basis of the greenways in Conghua District to enhance the regional ecological protection function and the spatial connectivity of the fragmentized ecological environments. The following results are obtained. First, the number of wild animal habitats of 300-500 hm2 is the largest and these sources are heavily concentrated in the north with small landscape resistance. On the other hand, wild animal habitats are distributed between towns in the south with high landscape resistance. Second, the longer the corridors and the higher their resistance, the smaller their number. Third, the spatial ecological network enhances the ecological functions of the greenway system through the intersection between corridors, nodes and established greenways. The network can minimize the destruction to nature and enhance the connectivity between different landscapes and greenways so as to satisfy the need of the residents to take exercise and have a rest and the need of wildlife to spread and migrate.
  • [1]
    李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等. 大城市边缘区景观破碎化空间异质性——以北京市顺义区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(17): 5363-5374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201317025.htm

    LI C, ZHANG F R, ZHU T F, et al. Analysis on spatial-temporal heterogeneities of landscape fragmentation in urban fringe area: a case study in Shunyi district of Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(17): 5363-5374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201317025.htm
    [2]
    赵锐锋, 姜朋辉, 赵海莉, 等. 黑河中游湿地景观破碎化过程及其驱动力分析[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(14): 4436-4449. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201314023.htm

    ZHAO R F, JIANG P H, ZHAO H L, et al. Fragmentation process of wetlands landscape in the middle reaches of the Heihe River and its driving forces analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(14): 4436-4449. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201314023.htm
    [3]
    BLOOM D E, CANNING D, FINK G. Urbanization and the wealth of nations[J]. Science, 2008, 319: 772-775. doi: 10.1126/science.1153057
    [4]
    LITTLE C E. Greenways for America[M]. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
    [5]
    WHYTE W H. Securing open space for urban America: conservation easements[J]. Soil Science, 1961, 92(2): 153. http://www.mendeley.com/research/securing-open-space-urban-america-conservation-easements-whytewh/
    [6]
    张云彬, 吴人韦. 欧洲绿道建设的理论与实践[J]. 中国园林, 2007, 23(8): 33-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2007.08.007

    ZHANG Y B, WU R W. The theory and practice of greenway construction in Europe[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2007, 23(8): 33-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2007.08.007
    [7]
    COLLINGE S K. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and plan-ning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 36(1): 59-77. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00341-6
    [8]
    赵珂, 李享, 袁南华. 从美国"绿道"到欧洲绿道: 城乡空间生态网络构建——以广州市增城区为例[J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(8): 82-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYL201708016.htm

    ZHAO K, LI X, YUAN N H. Form Amercian "greenway" to European greenway: the construction of ecological network in urban and rural space-a case study of Zengcheng district of Guangzhou[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2017, 33(8): 82-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYL201708016.htm
    [9]
    叶丹. 广州绿道与沿线历史文化景观关系研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2012.

    YE D. Study on the relationship between Guangzhou greenway and historical and cultural landscape[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2012.
    [10]
    朱雪梅. 基于文化线路的南粤古道、古村、绿道联动发展研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(2): 48-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2018.02.007

    ZHU X M. Interactive development research of nanyue historical trails, ancient villages and greenways based on a cultural route[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(2): 48-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2018.02.007
    [11]
    周盼, 吴雪飞, 陶丹凤, 等. 基于多重目标的绿道选线规划研究——以草原丝绸之路(元上都至元中都段)文化线路为例[J]. 规划师, 2014(8): 121-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2014.08.021

    ZHOU P, WU X F, TAO D F, et al. Multi-objectives green corridor planning: the prairie silk road case[J]. Planners, 2014(8): 121-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2014.08.021
    [12]
    何原荣, 李佳楠, 郑渊茂. "3S"技术在绿道规划中的应用综述[J]. 生态经济, 2016, 32(3): 217-221. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.03.044

    HE Y R, LI J N, ZHENG Y M. Application of "3S" technology in greenway planning: a literature review[J]. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32(3): 217-221. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.03.044
    [13]
    蒙吉军, 王雅, 王晓东. 基于最小累积阻力模型的贵阳市景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(7): 1052-1061. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201607006

    MENG J J, WANG Y, WANG X D. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern in Guiyang based on MCR model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze, 2016, 25(7): 1052-1061. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201607006
    [14]
    刘杰, 叶晶, 杨婉. 基于GIS的滇池流域景观格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(5): 801-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZX201205009.htm

    LIU J, YE J, YANG W. A GIS-based landscape patten opimization approach for lake dianchi watershed[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(5): 801-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZX201205009.htm
    [15]
    陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序. 基于"重要性—敏感性—连通性"框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 471-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLYJ201703007.htm

    CHRN X, PENG J, LIU Y X. Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu city based on the framework of importance-sensitivity-connectivity[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 471-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLYJ201703007.htm
    [16]
    孔繁花, 尹海伟. 济南城市绿地生态网络构建[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1711-1719. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.04.042

    KONG F H, YIN H W. Developing green space ecological networks in Jinan City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 1711-1719. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.04.042
    [17]
    许文雯, 孙翔, 朱晓东, 等. 基于生态网络分析的南京主城区重要生态斑块识别[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(4): 1264-1272. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201204029.htm

    XU W W, SUN X, ZHU X D, et al. Recognition of important ecological nodes based on ecological networks analysis: a case study of urban district of Nanjing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(4): 1264-1272. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201204029.htm
    [18]
    吉冬青, 文雅, 魏建兵. 流溪河流域土地利用景观生态安全动态分析[J]. 热带地理, 2013, 33(3): 299-306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDDD201303012.htm

    JI D Q, WEN Y, WEI J B. Dynamic trend of land use landscape ecological security in Liuxihe watershed[J]. Tropical Geography, 2013, 33(3): 299-306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDDD201303012.htm
    [19]
    吴隽宇, 游亚昀. 珠三角区域绿道(省立)一号线生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(3): 98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2017.03.019

    WU J Y, YOU Y J. Preliminary assessment of ecosystem services value of Pearl River Delta Greenway Line One[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2017, 33(3): 98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2017.03.019
    [20]
    KNAAPEN J P, SCHEFFER M, HARMS B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1992, 23: 1-16. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D
    [21]
    俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(1): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB901.001.htm

    YU K J. Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(1): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB901.001.htm
    [22]
    杜洪业, 徐程扬. 森林生态系统中关键种与群落动态的关系研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2012, 25(5): 35-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJLY201205006.htm

    DU H Y, XU C Y. Research progress of the relationship between keystone species and the dynamic of community in forestry ecosystem[J]. World Forestry Research, 2012, 25(5): 35-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJLY201205006.htm
    [23]
    刘振河, 徐尤辉. 穿山甲的生活习性及资源保护问题[J]. 动物学杂志, 1981(1): 42-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BIRD198101017.htm

    LIU Z H, XU Y H. Pangolin living habits and resource protection issues[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 1981(1): 42-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BIRD198101017.htm
    [24]
    吴诗宝, 马广智, 陈海, 等. 穿山甲洞穴生态学初步研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(3): 401-407. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.03.010

    WU S B, MA G Z, CHRN H, et al. A preliminary study on burrow ecology of Manis pentadactyla[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(3): 401-407. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.03.010
    [25]
    朱强, 俞孔坚, 李迪华. 景观规划中的生态廊道宽度[J]. 生态学报, 2005(9): 2406-2412. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.09.037

    ZHU Q, YU K J, LI D H. The width of ecological corridor in landscape planning[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005(9): 2406-2412. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.09.037

Catalog

    Article views (663) PDF downloads (71) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return