• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
GU Fenglong, LIU Qiaoyun, PENG Liang. Assessment of the Localization Quality:Orthogonal Versus Non-Orthogonal Localized Molecular Orbitals[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 50(5): 30-38. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2018097
Citation: GU Fenglong, LIU Qiaoyun, PENG Liang. Assessment of the Localization Quality:Orthogonal Versus Non-Orthogonal Localized Molecular Orbitals[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 50(5): 30-38. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2018097

Assessment of the Localization Quality:Orthogonal Versus Non-Orthogonal Localized Molecular Orbitals

  • Formulas of canonical molecular orbitals (CMO), orthogonal localized molecular orbital (OLMO), and non-orthogonal localized molecular orbital (NOLMO) to generate molecular orbitals are given. We have compared the orbital spread functions of some testing systems and their reduced percentage compared to the canonical molecular orbitals to assess the localization quality of each method. It is found that for the occupied orbitals, NOLMO is much more localized than CMOs and any OLMOs generated by Boys, Edmiston-Ruedenberg (ER), and Pipek-Mezey (PM) method, up to about 10-28% if the same cutoff threshold is applied.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return