梁祥, 刘梦赤, 胡婕, 冯嘉美. 融合习题难度和作答经验的深度知识追踪模型[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 55(4): 81-86. doi: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2023052
引用本文: 梁祥, 刘梦赤, 胡婕, 冯嘉美. 融合习题难度和作答经验的深度知识追踪模型[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 55(4): 81-86. doi: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2023052
LIANG Xiang, LIU Mengchi, HU Jie, FENG Jiamei. Deep Knowledge Tracing Model by Integrating Problem Difficulty and Answering Experience[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 55(4): 81-86. doi: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2023052
Citation: LIANG Xiang, LIU Mengchi, HU Jie, FENG Jiamei. Deep Knowledge Tracing Model by Integrating Problem Difficulty and Answering Experience[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 55(4): 81-86. doi: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2023052

融合习题难度和作答经验的深度知识追踪模型

Deep Knowledge Tracing Model by Integrating Problem Difficulty and Answering Experience

  • 摘要: 针对现有的深度知识追踪模型缺乏对习题和学生特征信息综合考虑的问题,文章提出融合习题难度和作答经验的深度知识追踪模型(DKT-DE)。该模型通过分析作答序列评估习题的难度和学生的作答经验来丰富模型输入层的特征信息,从而提高模型的预测性能。最后,在3个公共数据集(ASSISTments2009、ASSISTments2015、ASSISTments2017)上,对DKT-DE模型与5个基线模型(BKT、DKT、DKT+、DKVMN、SAKT模型)进行对比实验和消融实验。对比实验结果表明DKT-DE模型能够更准确地评估学生的知识掌握状态:与基线模型中表现最好的DKT+模型相比,DKT-DE模型在ASSISTments2009、ASSISTments2015、ASSISTments2017数据集上的AUC平均值分别提升了2.78%、2.44%、1.5%。而消融实验结果进一步证明习题难度和学生作答经验对提升模型预测能力都起到了积极的贡献。

     

    Abstract: Aiming at the problem that the existing deep knowledge tracking model lacks comprehensive consideration of exercises and student characteristic information. A deep knowledge tracking model by integrating problem difficulty and answering experience (DKT-DE) is proposed. The model evaluates the difficulty of the exercises and the students' answering experience by analyzing the answer sequence to enrich the feature information of the input layer of the model, thereby improving the prediction performance of the model. Finally, the DKT-DE model was compared with five baseline models(BKT, DKT, DKT+, DKVMN, SAKT model) through comparative experiments and ablation experiments on three public datasets(ASSISTments2009, ASSISTments2015, ASSISTments2017). The comparative experiment results demonstrate that the DKT-DE model can more accurately assess students' knowledge mastery. Compared with the best-performing baseline model, DKT+, the DKT-DE model achieves an average AUC improvement of 2.78%, 2.44%, and 1.5% on the ASSISTments2009, ASSISTments2015, and ASSISTments2017 datasets, respectively. The ablation experiment results further confirm the positive contributions of incorporating question difficulty and student response experience to enhance the predictive capability of the model.

     

/

返回文章
返回