气候变化和人类活动对汀江径流变化的贡献

张杰, 张正栋, 万露文, 杨传训, 叶晨

张杰, 张正栋, 万露文, 杨传训, 叶晨. 气候变化和人类活动对汀江径流变化的贡献[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 49(6): 84-91. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2017008
引用本文: 张杰, 张正栋, 万露文, 杨传训, 叶晨. 气候变化和人类活动对汀江径流变化的贡献[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 49(6): 84-91. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2017008
The contributions of climate change and human activities on the runoff of the Tingjiang River[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 49(6): 84-91. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2017008
Citation: The contributions of climate change and human activities on the runoff of the Tingjiang River[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 49(6): 84-91. DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2017008

气候变化和人类活动对汀江径流变化的贡献

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    张正栋

The contributions of climate change and human activities on the runoff of the Tingjiang River

  • 摘要: 基于汀江流域控制站溪口站19652012年日均径流量实测数据及长汀、上杭、永定气象站逐日降水、逐日气温资料,采用年段均值比较、5a滑动、趋势线分析和累积距平等方法,对流域近50年来的径流量序列进行分析,揭示径流量变化的趋势,判别径流量变化存在的2个突变年份,划分径流量变化的3个阶段. 应用改进后累积量斜率变化率比较法(SCRCQ)定量估算了近50年来气候变化和人类活动对汀江径流量变化的贡献率. 结果表明:(1)径流量总体呈现下降上升下降的波动,判别突变年份为1972、2001年,划分径流变化3个阶段为19651972年(A阶段)、19732001年(B阶段)、20022012年(C阶段);(2)与A阶段相比,B、C阶段气候变化对径流量变化的贡献率分别为65.1%、50.5%,而人类活动对径流量变化的贡献率为34.9%、49.5%,可见人类活动对径流量变化贡献日趋突出.
    Abstract: Based on 1965-2012 average daily runoff measured data of control hydrometric station (Xi Kou) in the Tingjiang Basin,and daily precipitation and daily temperature of three meteorological stations in the Tingjiang Basin (Chang Ting, Shang Hang, Yong Ding). Paragraph mean comparison, 5a sliding trend line analysis and cumulative anomaly methods are used to analyze runoff series in recent 50 years. The trend of runoff variation is revealed. The mutation years of runoff variation are identified. The stages of runoff variation are divided. The improved cumulative slope rate comparison method is used to quantitative analysis the contribution rate of the climate change and human activities to runoff variation of Tingjiang in nearly 50 years. The results show that:(1)The runoff shows a down-up- down fluctuation in general, and the mutation year is 1972 and 2001, divided into three stages: the runoff change from 1965 to 1972 (stage A), from 1973 to 2001 (stage B), from 2002 to 2012 (stage C).(2)Comparing with A phase, the contribution rates of climate change to runoff variation in B and C phases are 65.1% and 50.5%, respectively, while the contribution rate of human activities to runoff variation is 34.9% and 49.5%, respectively, visible human activities on the change of runoff with increasingprominent.
  • 期刊类型引用(5)

    1. 刘陵桦,孟维彩,蔡翠婷,李毅杰,袁宇奇,王晓宇,张翔,侯晓龙. 基于地理探测器的汀江流域福建段植被覆盖时空变化及驱动力分析. 水土保持通报. 2024(04): 236-246+382 . 百度学术
    2. 盛菲,刘士余,刘政,叶晶萍,杨敏. 基于三种方法的径流变化贡献率对比分析——以彭冲涧小流域为例. 人民长江. 2021(03): 66-69+75 . 百度学术
    3. 冯莹莹,胡茂川. 韩江流域极端水文事件时空分布特征研究. 西北水电. 2021(05): 1-9+16 . 百度学术
    4. 邱俊杰,靳建辉,任永青,左昕昕,李志忠. 福建汀江流域新石器—青铜时期聚落遗址分布特征及其环境背景. 山地学报. 2021(06): 791-805 . 百度学术
    5. 叶晶萍,刘政,欧阳磊,盛菲,刘士余. 不同时间尺度小流域径流变化及其归因分析. 生态学报. 2019(12): 4478-4487 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1368
  • HTML全文浏览量:  111
  • PDF下载量:  184
  • 被引次数: 12
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-05-02
  • 修回日期:  2016-06-29
  • 刊出日期:  2017-12-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回